.svg)
Influency.me pricing isn't published anywhere — no pricing page, no tiers, no starting number. Every button on the site leads to a demo request form, and the only public figure floating around is a reported ~USD $20,000/year for their full-service engagements.
In this review, we cover Influency.me's pricing structure, standout features, real user feedback, and whether it's worth it for your team. We also flag where the quote-based model works in your favour and where it costs you leverage.
If you're a brand running or scaling an influencer program in Brazil or LATAM — or you're comparing regional platforms against global ones — this breakdown is for you.
Best for: Brands and agencies running influencer campaigns in Brazil and LATAM that want software and a managed team from the same vendor
Starting price: Quote-based (reported ~$20,000/year for managed service)
Free trial: No
G2 rating: No reviews on G2; 5.0/5 from a single GetApp review
Our verdict: Genuinely strong LATAM database and automation, but the pricing opacity and annual lock-in make it hard to justify unless Brazil is your core market
What Is Influency.me?
Influency.me is a São Paulo-based influencer marketing company that's been operating for close to a decade and positions itself as the LATAM category leader, with clients across five Latin American countries. It sells three distinct products: Studio (the software), House (managed service), and Stars (talent casting).
The product and website are Portuguese-first with a Spanish LATAM version, and the case studies skew heavily Brazilian — Carrefour, Shein, Xbox, Beyoung, McCain. The hybrid model of software plus agency plus talent roster under one roof is rare among English-first competitors, and it's the main reason brands end up on their site in the first place.
The platform now claims over 10 million indexed creators on Instagram, TikTok, YouTube and X, up from the 8 million figure still sitting in some of their older page copy. Filters cover location, niche, age range, gender, follower count, audience profile, mentioned keywords and minimum engagement rate.
Depth in Brazilian and LATAM creators is the real differentiator here. If your campaigns are concentrated outside those markets, you're paying for a database that mostly isn't relevant to you.
You input your budget and strategy, and the system builds a projected campaign funnel with targets attached. It then measures actual results against that funnel, so you can see exactly where a campaign over- or under-delivered without building the model in a spreadsheet yourself.
This is one of the more useful features for teams that struggle to forecast influencer performance before spending.
The platform monitors social networks around the clock and pulls in posts and stories as creators publish them. Customer testimonials repeatedly single this out as the biggest time-saver — no more manually screenshotting stories before the 24-hour window closes.
Every influencer profile includes a rate calculator based on CPM benchmarks by niche, letting you sanity-check whether a creator's asking price is fair. For teams new to negotiating with creators and without their own benchmark data, this is genuinely handy — and it's not something most global platforms bother to build.
Each creator card shows total reach, audience age and gender split, resonance, plus the brands, topics and locations they mention most often, alongside a timeline of recent posts. It's a solid vetting layer, though note that day-to-day creator communication mostly happens over WhatsApp rather than in-platform.
Influency.me sells three separate products rather than a tiered SaaS ladder, and none of them carry public pricing. You book a call and get a quote based on your campaign scope.
This is the closest thing to traditional influencer marketing SaaS: the 10M+ database, search filters, campaign planning, contracts, activity scheduling, automated post capture and reporting. It's built for brands running campaigns in-house who want the tooling but not the service layer. Pricing is negotiated per account, and the annual commitment is the trade-off for access — there's no monthly rolling option advertised.
House is the agency offer, not software. Their team handles planning, recruitment, execution, creative direction and reporting, with performance targets written into the contract. The reported ~$20K figure comes from this tier, with three-month activations sometimes negotiable instead of the full year.
Worth being clear: this is a service retainer, not a software seat. Comparing it directly against a $299/month SaaS subscription is apples to oranges.
Stars connects you to Influency.me's own creator roster, with guaranteed view counts written into the contract. Cost scales with campaign size and creator mix, so there's no flat rate to quote. The view guarantee is a real differentiator if you've been burned by campaigns that underdelivered on reach.
G2 lists Influency.me with zero reviews. GetApp shows a 5.0/5 rating from exactly one review, and that same review records a likelihood-to-recommend score of 1 out of 10, which tells you the sample size is far too small to read anything into.
More telling: the reviews that do exist appear to come from the creator side of the marketplace, not the brand side. One reviewer described using the platform to organise and track their collaborations, monitor campaign progress, and communicate with brands and agencies — that's an influencer's workflow, not a marketer's. The same reviewer noted that the interface, while functional, could be more modern and intuitive, which is the most consistent critique across what little feedback exists.
Where the signal is stronger is in Influency.me's own client testimonials, and the theme there is consistent enough to be credible: automation and time savings. Marketing analysts from Vizzela, Dux Nutrition and Mais Mu all point to automated delivery capture as the reason they stay.
The brands it genuinely suits: mid-market and enterprise brands running ongoing influencer campaigns in Brazil or LATAM, with budgets in the five-figure-annual range and a preference for working with a local partner in Portuguese. If you want the option to hand execution to a managed team without switching vendors, the Studio-to-House path is a real advantage.
Agencies serving Brazilian clients are the other clear fit, especially given the partner program with discounted subscriptions and referral commission.
Where it falls short: if your creator program is global or English-speaking, most of what you're paying for doesn't apply. A DTC brand in the US or UK gets a database heavily weighted toward creators it will never work with, a Portuguese-first interface, and support in a different timezone and language.
Smaller brands are the other mismatch. At a reported $20K/year for the service tier and an annual commitment on the software side, this isn't a platform you trial with a $2,000 test campaign. Below roughly $50K in annual creator spend, the platform cost eats too much of your budget — and there are transparent alternatives starting at a few hundred dollars a month that will do the discovery and tracking job fine.
If you're running influencer campaigns in Brazil at meaningful volume, yes. The LATAM database is the deepest you'll find, the automated capture solves a real operational headache, and contractual performance guarantees are genuinely uncommon in this category. A decade of local market presence also means their team knows the creators, the rates and the platform quirks in a way a global tool won't.
Where it stops being worth it is everywhere else. The pricing opacity is the biggest problem — you can't compare Influency.me against anything without booking a call, and by the time you have a number you've already invested hours in the process. Combine that with annual lock-in, no trial, and a review base too thin to validate independently, and the risk profile is high for any brand whose campaigns aren't concentrated in LATAM. If Brazil isn't central to your strategy, keep looking.
If the pricing opacity, the annual commitment, or the regional focus is what's holding you back, here are five alternatives worth comparing — each solving a different piece of the problem.
A Brazilian platform with proprietary tech and end-to-end campaign management, positioned around performance. Pricing is quote-based like Influency.me, but Air has a reputation for serving mid-sized companies that want to professionalise their campaigns without enterprise-level spend. Pick it over Influency.me if you want LATAM coverage with a lower entry point and a closer service relationship.
A discovery-first platform with a 350M+ creator database, transparent published pricing from around $199–$299/month, and a 14-day free trial. It covers Instagram, TikTok and YouTube globally with strong audience authenticity data and automatic Instagram Story collection. Choose Modash over Influency.me if you want to see the price before the sales call and test the database before you commit — the exact two things Influency.me won't let you do.
Influencer Hero
An all-in-one influencer marketing platform covering creator discovery, an influencer CRM, automated outreach and follow-up sequences, campaign management, gifting, affiliate tracking, payments and reporting. Pricing is published at $649, $1,049 and $2,490/month. The reason a brand picks it over Influency.me is workflow scope: Influency.me handles discovery, contracts and monitoring well, but creator conversations happen on WhatsApp, whereas Influencer Hero keeps outreach through to conversion in one system with native Shopify integration.
One of Brazil's original influencer platforms, founded in 2014 with a stated 260,000+ registered creators across Latin America and a specialism in micro-influencers. Pricing is quote-based. Worth choosing over Influency.me if your strategy leans on volume campaigns with many small creators rather than a smaller number of mid- and macro-tier partnerships.
A global end-to-end platform with e-commerce integrations across Shopify, Klaviyo and Amazon, plus a feature that identifies influencers already buying from your store. Pricing is quote-based and typically starts higher than Modash. Pick it over Influency.me if you need global reach with commerce data tied directly to creator activity — but expect the same annual-contract friction.
Influency.me stands out for LATAM influencer campaigns, with a deep creator database, automated content capture, and performance guarantees. But it comes with no public pricing, no free trial, an annual commitment, and higher agency-style costs.
For many brands, the bigger question is whether they need a traditional influencer platform at all. Creator Hero offers a different approach: creators build commission-based storefronts and earn 20–50% affiliate commission on sales, so brands avoid upfront campaign costs and long-term contracts. With transparent pricing (Free, Pro at $19/month, Premium at $65/month) and 55,000+ brands in its directory, it's a more accessible alternative.
Let the creators do the selling for you, so you can focus on developing new products and scaling your brand. Explore Creator Hero for brands or book a free demo to see how it works.
_logo.svg.png){kind=logo}
%201.png)
